博通或成东芝芯片业务新东家 获180亿美元资金支持
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Computer science and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | WikiProject Computer science was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 7 November 2011. |
Draft: Brainchip
[edit]could someone review the Draft:Brainchip page? Birdmanoftech (talk), 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Haskell § Proposed merge from Haskell features
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Haskell § Proposed merge from Haskell features. Gracen (they/them) 16:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello. Project members are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. There is $500 of prizes going into improving STEM and business-related articles and we want to see a lot of articles from these fields destubbed and older stale articles improved. If you are interested in winning some vouchers to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for science, sign up if interested.? Dr. Blofeld 10:45, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Bubble sort in parallel
[edit]Bubble sort says that it is O(n) when run in parallel. Someone recently added a reference for that, but it assumes that you have n processors. In reality, there will be a fixed number of processors, so it isn't really O(n) when run in parallel, is it? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Related. I've just started it! Nextada (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hamming distance
[edit]The Hamming distance article is a bit vague in its introduction; see my question and a response to it at WP:RD/MA. Could someone reword the introduction so its error-counting is clearer? Nyttend (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- What is vague about "the number of positions at which the corresponding symbols are different"? Put another way, what other interpretation or interpretations did you have in mind that the correct interpretation might have been confused with? I see you have some hints of this in your RD/MA question but you seem to have overlooked the word "positions" and focused only on the symbols. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
need help with the Flynn Taxonomy page
[edit]Flynn's taxonomy is a high-importance topic with 371 pages linking to it. however until I started editing it, it had absolutely no reference whatsoever to Flynn's 1972 paper (actually written in 1970 under a US Govt Atomic Energy Commission Contract). Images are needed which illustrate the 3 types of SIMD that Flynn drew in figure 5 of the 1972 paper but I cannot find anything. some help needed as the topic is very hard to understand without a graphic. Lkcl (talk) 07:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Is this notable - or not? It's been tagged as unsourced for 11 years and tagged even longer for notability concerns. There are external links. Please help us resolve this issue once and for all. Pinging Wikiacc. Bearian (talk) 21:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)